Capcom Assures Smooth Launch for Resident Evil Requiem After Monster Hunter Wilds Debacle

When Monster Hunter Wilds launched in late February 2025, it was immediately panned by PC gamers for what many called "atrocious performance" and "poor optimization." These issues weren't entirely unexpected—they'd carried over from the game's second beta—but their persistence at launch was severe enough to earn a "Mixed" review status on Steam and force an official apology from Capcom. Fast forward to today, and the gaming giant is making bold promises about its next major title, Resident Evil Requiem, vowing it won't suffer the same fate when it releases next February. But can players really trust Capcom after the Wilds fiasco?

The fallout from Monster Hunter Wilds has been nothing short of catastrophic for Capcom's reputation among PC gamers. Even now, eight months post-launch, the game sits with "Mostly Negative" recent reviews on Steam. A quick breakdown of the last 30 days tells the story:

Players aren't just complaining—they're furious. One particularly scathing review from a gamer with 143 hours logged stated: "It’s been eight months, and the company still hasn’t done anything to address it. This is the first game where I’ve actually had to undervolt my GPU because I was getting visual artifacts. That’s just bad practice. A game should never be in this state at release, especially at full price." Comments like these paint a bleak picture of trust eroded by persistent technical failures.

So when Capcom faced investors during a recent financial Q&A session, the inevitable question arose: Will Resident Evil Requiem suffer the same optimization nightmares? The company was quick to throw Monster Hunter Wilds under the bus with a pointed response. "Resident Evil Requiem differs from Monster Hunter Wilds in terms of gameplay, system architecture, and network features," Capcom clarified. "At present, we do not anticipate similar risks. We are developing the game to provide a smooth gaming experience across a wide range of PC specifications." It's a reassuring statement, but one that rings hollow for many still stung by Wilds' unfulfilled promises. After all, haven't we heard similar assurances before?

🔍 People Also Ask

1. Why did Monster Hunter Wilds have such severe performance issues?

The problems stemmed from poor optimization for diverse PC hardware configurations, exacerbated by network features straining systems. These issues were evident in beta tests but went unresolved at launch.

1. How is Resident Evil Requiem different technically?

Capcom claims Requiem's architecture isn't as complex as Wilds' open-world design and lacks the same demanding network components. This theoretically allows for better scalability across lower-end systems.

1. Has Capcom fixed Monster Hunter Wilds yet?

As of late 2025, no significant performance patches have addressed core complaints, leading to ongoing negative reviews. Many consider it abandoned.

⚖️ The Stakes for Capcom

The pressure on Resident Evil Requiem is immense. Another botched launch could permanently damage Capcom's credibility in the PC market—a space where competitors like CD Projekt Red have rebounded from rocky starts (remember Cyberpunk 2077?) through relentless updates. But while CD Projekt redeemed itself, Capcom's silence on Wilds suggests a different philosophy. Are they betting everything on Requiem being technically simpler? Or is this just corporate damage control?

Consider the broader implications: In an era where games increasingly push hardware limits, should publishers mandate longer beta-testing phases? Or perhaps adopt tiered releases where optimization is verified region by region? And what responsibility do players bear for pre-ordering based on trailers rather than performance metrics? 🤔

Ultimately, Capcom’s assurances about Resident Evil Requiem sound comforting—but they’re just words until February 2026. If Requiem stumbles, will gamers accept another apology? Or has Wilds burned too many bridges to rebuild? Only time will tell whether this is genuine improvement or corporate spin designed to soothe shareholders while players suffer.